Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Robert Swift v. , et alIn re: Robert Swift v. , et al
as 23-2887
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT SWIFT
Respondent:
RAMESH PANDEY and BRIAN R. MARTINOTTI
Debtor:
BHUWAN PANDEY
Defendant / Appellee:
XECHEM INDIA PVT LTD
SWIFT FINANCIAL, LLC v. PIK SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 2:2021cv17787
Plaintiff:
SWIFT FINANCIAL, LLC
Defendant:
PIK SOLUTIONS, LLC
Ivan McKinney v. George Robinson, et al
as 20-2770
Defendant:
OFFICER WHITAKER, OFFICER IRWIN, ASST. SUPERINTENDENT GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ASST. ADMINISTRATOR ANTONIO CAMPOS
Myron Moton v. Wetzel, et al
as 20-2432
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, DAVY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Myron Moton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-2773
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. SWIFT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
Karlin v. Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01193
Defendant:
Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, Cotiviti Holdings, Inc., Rube Jose King-Shaw, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Muriel Karlin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rosenblatt v. Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01149
Defendant:
Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, Cotiviti Holdings, Inc., David Swift and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Geller v. Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01110
Defendant:
Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, R. Halsey Wise, Rube Jose King-Shaw, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Geller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
