Cases 81 - 90 of 111
BARTON
as 1:2017cv12725
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH BARTON
Defendant:
& JOHNSON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OVERSTREET
as 1:2017cv12714
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN OVERSTREET
Defendant:
JOHNSON JOHNSON &
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Of America v. Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv02139
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Carla J. Johnson and Charles D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILTROUT et al
as 3:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TERESA A. WILTROUT and CHARLES R. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PATERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY v. JOHNSON
as 2:2017cv04289
Plaintiff:
PATERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY
Defendant:
CHENA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2017cv02719
Plaintiff:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
ERIC JOHNSON, ANN JOHNSON and ROBERT MAHONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Michael Selig v. North Whitehall Township ZHB, et al
as 16-1072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. SELIG
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH WHITEHALL TOWNSHIP ZHB and JUDGE J. BRIAN JOHNSON
HARRIS v. PHILLY PROP.COM INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2015cv06347
Plaintiff:
VERNITA PATRICIA MARSHA HARRIS
Defendant:
PHILLY PROP.COM INCORPORATED , JOSEPH CASILE , INVEST SMART LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHRISTOFFERSEN et al v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv05765
Plaintiff:
DEAN CHRISTOFFERSEN , STEVEN BROWN , MARK LAW and others
Defendant:
BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DB50 2011-1 TRUST v. MASTORIS et al
as 3:2015cv05726
Defendant:
MRS. MICHAEL N. MASTORIS, PRINCETON ANESTHESIA SERVICES, HICKORY RIDGE FARM and others
Plaintiff:
DB50 2011-1 TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
