Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, RECORDER OF DEEDS v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 2:2014cv05500
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, RECORDER OF DEEDS
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., CITIBANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANTELL v. FIRST NIAGRA BANK et al
as 2:2013cv01482
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTELL
Defendant:
FIRST NIAGRA BANK, HARLEYSVILLE NATIONAL BANK, CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CitiBank, NA, as Trustee for WaMu Series 2007-HE-2 Trust v. Hamorski
as 3:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
CitiBank, NA, as Trustee for WaMu Series 2007-HE-2 Trust
Defendant:
Michael E. Hamorski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MENICHINO et al v. CITIBANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
LINDA MENICHINO and VINCENT MENICHINO
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A., CITIMORTGAGE, INC., CITIBANK MORTGAGE REINSURANCE, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.076 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST WHITELAND TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 42-03-0497 et al
as 2:2009cv01072
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC and TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.076 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST WHITELAND TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 42-03-0497, JUN KONG, GUOCHANG ZHAO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Citibank, NA v. Hamorski
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Citibank, NA
Defendant:
Michael E. Hamorski and Laura S. Hamorski
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Citibank, N.A., as Trustee for WaMu Series 2007-HE2 Trust v. Hamorski et al
as 4:2008cv01114
Plaintiff:
Citibank, N.A., as Trustee for WaMu Series 2007-HE2 Trust
Defendant:
Michael E. Hamorski and Laura S. Hamorski
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
