Cases 1 - 6 of 6
TEAGARDEN-HARD v. KONINKELIJKE NV et al
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY TEAGARDEN-HARD
Defendant:
KONINKELIJKE NV, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Deutsche Bank National Trust C v. James Harding, Jr., et al
as 15-1442
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO, as Trustee for WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-AR11-Trust
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES W HARDING, JR., his heirs, devisees, and personal representatives and his/her, their, or any of their successors in right, title and interest, JOHN OLMO, his heirs, devisees, and personal representatives and his/her, their, or any of their successors in right, title and interest and CARALEE OLMO, his wife, her heirs, devisees, and personal representatives and his/her, their, or any of their successors in right, title and interest
Defendant - Appellee:
MRS. HARDING, wife of James W. Harding, Jr., her heirs, devisees, and personal representatives and his/her, their, or any of their successors in right, title and interest and WINDING CREEK AT OLD TAPPAN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY v. HARDING et al
as 3:2013cv02960
Plaintiff:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
JAMES W. HARDING, JR., HARDING, JOHN J. OLMO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Harding et al
as 3:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Celena M. Harding and Richard M. Harding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HARDING
as 1:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LYNETTE A. HARDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
HARDING et al v. BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES LTD.
as 2:2007cv02557
Plaintiff:
ED HARDING
Defendant:
BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
