Cases 11 - 20 of 44
HARRIS et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04912
Plaintiff:
DONTA L. HARRIS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. ZIMMER, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03970
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L HARRIS
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corey Harris v. Mark Causgrove
as 14-1622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY L. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK CAUSGROVE, In His Official Capacity As Child Support Director of Domestic Relation Section Enforcement fir Erie Pennsylvania, BARRY GROSSMAN, In His Official Capacity as Erie County Executive of Government Agency of Erie County Pennsylvania and LARIE ZACK
HARRIS v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv05771
Plaintiff:
ROSIE L. HARRIS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , ABC COS. 1-100, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. CORBETT et al
as 1:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS
Defendant:
MARK CAUSGROCE, ERIC ROLLINS, LARRY ZACK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. EIDE
as 2:2011cv07356
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. HARRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL EIDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv68084
Plaintiff:
WILLIE L. HARRIS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv68569
Plaintiff:
WILLIE L. HARRIS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51431
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR L. HARRIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48464
Plaintiff:
ANDREW L. HARRIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
