Cases 11 - 20 of 74
ARRINGTON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv03002
Plaintiff:
RODNEY ARRINGTON
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION , CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , HUDSON VALLEY LOGISTICS, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COTE v. U.S. SILICA COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv00835
Plaintiff:
DAYTON COTE
Defendant:
U.S. SILICA COMPANY , NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION , SCHNELL INDUSTRIES and others
Cross_claimant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
FB INDUSTRIES, SCHNELL INDUSTRIES and U.S. SILICA COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARLIP v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 5:2018cv00475
Plaintiff:
DALE BARLIP
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Massaro v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
David Massaro
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
RONE et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2017cv08069
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION , NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. RONE and LINDA RONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KONDERTAVAGE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 5:2017cv03143
Plaintiff:
ADAM KONDERTAVAGE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Wolfkill v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2017cv01025
Plaintiff:
Jenifer Wolfkill
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
POWERS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv00648
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE POWERS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
GRATTIC v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv01836
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA GRATTIC
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FETHEROLF v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 5:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FETHEROLF
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
