Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Socorro Diaz, et al v. CR Bard Inc
as 23-2082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOCORRO KERBEL DIAZ and STEVEN KERBEL
Defendant / Appellee:
CR BARD INC
FORD et al v. CR ENGLAND INC. et al
as 1:2022cv05266
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FORD and CHARICE LILLY
Defendant:
CR ENGLAND INC., BRENDA LILLY and CHRISTOPHER MCADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
STONER v. CR BARD, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00246
Plaintiff:
HARRY STONER
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED, MCKESSON CORPORATION, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatchett v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv04034
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC., CR BARD INC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100 INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
Shihee Hatchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pawelczyk v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01474
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc, Does 1 through 100 inclusive, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Alice Pawelczyk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONTENEGRO v. SIMON PROPERTY GROUP d/b/a THE MILLS AT JERSEY GARDENS et al
as 2:2020cv02422
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-5 (names being ficttitious as true identities are unknown at this time), CRS FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
AMPARO MONTENEGRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROBERTS v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv15442
Plaintiff:
TABITHA ROBERTS
Defendant:
BARD DAVOL, INC., CR BARD, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PROVOST v. CR BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv15131
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC. and CR BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PROVOST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNEZ et al v. CR BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03925
Defendant:
CR BARD, INC. and BARD DAVOL, INC.
Plaintiff:
JESUS NUNEZ and VIRIGINA NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHIRICO v. BENNETT et al
as 2:2016cv02993
Plaintiff:
FRANK CHIRICO
Defendant:
SHARON BENNETT, CR ENGLAND INC. , ALLSTATE ABC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
