Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
SHAW v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv10714
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, COSMETIC TOILETRY AND FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff: SUSITHEA D. SHAW
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LabMD, INC. V THE PRIVACY INSTITUTE ET AL
as 2:2020cv00766
Defendant: ROBERT J. BOBACK, THE PRIVACY INSTITUTE, REED SMITH LLP and others
Plaintiff: LABMD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LABMD, INC. et al v. TIVERSA HOLDING CORP. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01365
Plaintiff: LABMD, INC. and MICHAEL J. DAUGHERTY
Defendant: TIVERSA HOLDING CORP. , ROBERT J. BOBACK, REED SMITH LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAW v. ALCOA STEAMSHIP CO.
as 2:2010cv50600
Plaintiff: JAMES D SHAW
Defendant: ALCOA STEAMSHIP CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SHAW v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv50601
Plaintiff: JAMES D SHAW
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SHAW v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34063
Plaintiff: JAMES D. SHAW
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SHAW v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv88925
Plaintiff: CHARLES D. SHAW, CHARLES D. SHAW, BETTY SHAW and others
Defendant: GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SHAW v. A.M. LOCKETT & CO., ET AL.
as 2:2008cv77151
Plaintiff: LARRY D. SHAW and LARRY D. SHAW
Defendant: A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?