Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Sergei Kovalev v. Home Depot USA Inc, et al
as 24-2025
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA INC, HOME DEPOT INC, HOME DEPOT NO 4112 and others
PYLES v. HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06414
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE PYLES
Defendant:
HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC., THE HOME DEPOT USA INC., HOME DEPOT STORE #0919 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ZHANG v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
as 1:2024cv06353
Plaintiff:
Xueyong Zhang
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morales v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Pedro Morales
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Anastasios Smalis v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 24-1094
Plaintiff:
ANASTASIOS M. SMALIS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA INC
Defendant / Appellee:
DIVERSIFIED MAINTENANCE SERVICES and DMC MANAGEMENT LLC
MARULLO v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
as 3:2023cv23267
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARULLO
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
MARULLO v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
as 2:2023cv23267
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARULLO
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MCKNIGHT v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
as 2:2023cv23127
Plaintiff:
BESSIE MCKNIGHT
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
MCGONIGLE v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
as 2:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MCGONIGLE
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC. trading and doing business as HOME DEPOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
FAIR RUFFIN v. HOME DEPOT, USA, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE FAIR RUFFIN
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC. and HOME DEPOT STORE #914
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
