Cases 1 - 10 of 101
SCHWARTZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv02506
Plaintiff:
NAN SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHWARTZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv02267
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SCHWARTZ
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHWARTZ et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv16772
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHWARTZ and THE ESTATE OF NATALIE SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHWARTZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15653
Plaintiff:
DENISE SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHWARTZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15672
Plaintiff:
JULIA SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHWARTZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11357
Plaintiff:
DANA SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHWARTZ et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv10740
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCHWARTZ and The Estate of REBECCA SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHWARTZ v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03250
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Susan Moor, et al v. Alliance HC II LLC, et al
as 23-1807
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUSAN M. MOOR, individually and ESTATE OF JOHN J. WATTERS, Susan M. Moor as General Administrator and Administrator and Prosequendum of the Estate
Defendant / Appellant:
ALLIANCE HC II LLC, DBA Andover Subacute Rehabilitation I, DBA Woodland Behavioral and Nursing Center, WOODLAND BEHAVIORAL AND NURSING CENTER, ANDOVER SUBACUTE AND REHABILITATION II and others
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION AND ABC PARTNETSHIP, (the aforesaid names being fictitious and their true names being unknown)
BEST et al v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.,
as 2:2023cv02387
Plaintiff:
MELANIE BEST, STEVE CONRAD, MARK COPPOLA and others
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
