Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis v. GEICO Indemnity Company
as 3:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Defendant:
GEICO Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Davis v. Loeb
as 3:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Harvey Loeb
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv08512
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. AbbVie et al
as 4:2014cv01587
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis and Patricia Davis
Defendant:
AbbVie and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carolyn Freidrich v. Thomas Davi
as 14-1031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLYN FREIDRICH, f/k/a Carolyn Zimmermann
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DAVIS
FREIDRICH v. DAVIS
as 2:2012cv05604
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN FREIDRICH
Defendant:
THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DAVIS et al v. AC AND S, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv80283
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS, THOMAS DAVIS, MARY E. DAVIS and others
Defendant:
AC AND S, INCORPORATED, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2008cv70896
Plaintiff:
JAN THOMAS DAVIS and MELISSA T DAVIS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DAVIS v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv61804
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A C AND S, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
