Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00761
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Michael Jones, Sarah Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
PARISE et al v. VAN PELT et al
as 3:2017cv13434
Plaintiff:
MARJORIE PARISE and ROBERT PARISE
Defendant:
DANIEL M. VAN PELT, THOMAS GANNON, GORDON VON SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MURPHY v. HANNA et al
as 3:2017cv02412
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MURPHY
Defendant:
JOSEPH HANNA, NAGIB HANNA and CLASS 1 CLASSIC CARS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MURPHY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02629
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MURPHY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART.COM USA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HVIZDAK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv01296
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HVIZDAK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
DIPIETRO v. LANDIS TITLE COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv05110
Plaintiff:
PETER DIPIETRO
Defendant:
LANDIS TITLE COMPANY , RENIE GEULD , BALLARD SPAHR, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
VENABLE v. MURPHY
as 2:2010cv07237
Plaintiff:
ALLEN VENABLE
Defendant:
FRANCIS X. MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY et al v. GENWORTH FINANCIAL et al
as 2:2010cv00983
Plaintiff:
JOHN G. MURPHY and HELEN E. MURPHY
Defendant:
GENWORTH FINANCIAL and GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANTAGE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, L.L.C. et al v. VAN PASSEL
as 2:2009cv04228
Plaintiff:
VANTAGE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, L.L.C. and PETER MURPHY
Defendant:
MARC VAN PASSEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
BOND et al v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
as 2:2008cv05371
Plaintiff:
THEODORE E. BOND, CLAUDE FEDER, GRAHAM A. HUGHES and others
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
