Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins, Angela Agosto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mourey et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Tracey Mourey, Kenneth Mourey, Jr., Levi Murphy and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
ACHEY et al v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al
as 3:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ACHEY, MARILYN ACHEY, JUSTIN ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
ACHEY et al
as 3:2022cv00751
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ACHEY, MARILYN ACHEY, JUSTIN ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAFFERI GROUP, LLC v. LAMOS et al
as 2:2021cv16941
Plaintiff:
RAFFERI GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
JUAN LAMOS, ALEX POU, ANDREW CHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv16713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
AUSTIN v. HASHIM et al
as 2:2021cv01955
Plaintiff:
ANDREW B. AUSTIN
Defendant:
PAUL HASHIM and U.S. CLAIMS SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DSIDA v. ESPOSITO
as 2:2021cv00427
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DSIDA
Defendant:
HEATHER ESPOSITO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOLDOVSKY et al v. Ellner et al
as 2:2021cv01365
Defendant:
LIGHTBOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, LIGHTBOX VENTURES, LLC and Andrew Ellner
Plaintiff:
BREM MOLDOVSKY and BREM MOLDOVSKY, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
