Cases 101 - 110 of 1,710
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EIVICH v. EAST GREENWICH TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2020cv06851
Plaintiff:
EDWARD EIVICH
Defendant:
STANLEY D. ATKINSON III, JOHN DOES 1-10, EAST GREENWICH TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VITALE v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2022cv02619
Plaintiff:
DAVID VITALE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, DAVID JENKINS, JOHN HALPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
HINES v. BOROUGH OF BELMAR et al
as 3:2022cv07335
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN T. HINES
Counter Claimant:
BOROUGH OF BELMAR
Defendant:
MARK WALSIFER, EDWARD KIRSCHENBAUM, DETECTIVE PHILLIP BORHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEXANDER v. EATON et al
as 5:2022cv05066
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND H. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
KELLY EATON, STEPHEN CULLEN, TODD CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OKPOR v. CLOVER MOTEL et al
as 1:2022cv07218
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OKPOR
Defendant:
CLOVER MOTEL, DETECTIVE JOSEPH Y SHAW, JENNIFER PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
