Cases 171 - 180 of 46,868
Whaley v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, County of Dauphin et al
as 1:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
George H. Whaley, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, County of Dauphin and Officer Natalie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. SCHAEFER
as 2:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
MELLONZO BEY
Defendant:
JENNIFER SCHAEFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HARDAWAY v. HARDAWAY et al
as 2:2024cv01801
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
RAYMOND J HARDAWAY and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SHENK v. AMY L. GRIFFITHS
as 2:2024cv00957
Defendant:
AMY L. GRIFFITHS and AMY L. SHENK
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A. SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACOBY JAMES v. HICKS et al
as 2:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
DURON JACOBY JAMES
Defendant:
NATASHA HICKS, TRANSUNION, EXPERIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
