Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WATKINS v. CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
SHAQUANNA WATKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILBERTO RUIZ, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHEATHAM v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv08824
Plaintiff:
TERELL CHEATHAM
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , CITY OF JERSEY CITY , ANDREW J. BARELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHOI v. BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK et al
as 2:2016cv05398
Plaintiff:
JAY HOON CHOI
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK, THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, PALISADES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
MENDY BROTHERS, LLC et al v. ESTATE OF GANDOLFO et al
as 2:2016cv02659
Plaintiff:
MENDY BROTHERS, LLC and EDWARD B. MENDY
Defendant:
ESTATE OF GANDOLFO, P. INGARDIA, S. CASTELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WITHERSPOON v. DEF JAM
as 2:2015cv02063
Plaintiff:
DESMOND M. WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
DEF JAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
