Civil Rights Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2099
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1533
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Yan Yan v. Fox Chase Cancer Center, et al
as 14-4670
Plaintiff - Appellant: YAN YAN
Defendant - Appellee: FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA and FAN HUA YING
PURDIE et al v. SPICER et al
as 2:2014cv06639
Plaintiff: RONALD PURDIE , RAGIB WITHERSPOON and JAMES FANNINGS
Defendant: MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-4392
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
YAN v. FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER et al
as 2:2014cv05136
Plaintiff: YAN YAN
Defendant: FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA and FAN HUA YING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3640
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1634
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03858
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07749
Plaintiff: NICOLE THOMPSON
Defendant: DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. , SUBWAY FAN, INC., AVONDALE SUBWAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?