Cases 11 - 20 of 1,725
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07793
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
ALEXANDRE v. HCSC ENTERPRISES, INC et al
as 3:2024cv07722
Plaintiff:
VILLAIRE ALEXANDRE
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, HCSC ENTERPRISES, INC and ABC CORPS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
MEAGHER v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER
as 3:2024cv07614
Defendant:
ROBERT CHANKALIAN, JONATHAN SALONIS, TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY MEAGHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SCOTT v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv07134
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS 1-10
Plaintiff:
HANEEFAH SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07129
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06902
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
