Cases 21 - 29 of 29
KNAPP et al v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2010cv01429
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. KNAPP and DIANE S. KNAPP
Defendant:
DOUGLAS ADAMS, KIM CLEMENTS, MICHELLE POLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coss v. Jordan et al
as 3:2010cv01479
Plaintiff:
Edward Coss
Defendant:
William Jordan, Gene Ruddy, Officer Kapac and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
CLEMENTS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2009cv03527
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CLEMENTS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Admiral et al v. Hilton Scranton & Conference Center et al
as 3:2008cv00287
Plaintiff:
Sheena Admiral, Sheena Admiral, Pauline Barnwell and others
Defendant:
Hilton Scranton & Conference Center and Getaway Weekend Vacations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CLEMENTS v. RYAN et al
as 2:2007cv02353
Plaintiff:
CURTIS M. CLEMENTS
Defendant:
RYAN and SCOTT GILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Democracy Rising PA v. Celluci et al
as 1:2007cv00860
Plaintiff:
Democracy Rising PA
Defendant:
John R. Celluci, Charles A. Clement, Jr., Charles J. Cunningham, III and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE, INC. et al v. CELLUCI et al
as 2:2007cv01707
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE, INC., JEFFREY J. REICH, HOWARD F. KNISELY and others
Defendant:
JOHN R. CELLUCI, CHARLES A. CLEMENT, JR., PATRICK JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
