Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Telesweeps of Butler Valley In v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 12-4048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TELESWEEPS OF BUTLER VALLEY INC
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LUZERNE COUNTY
Intervenor-Defendant:
SANDS BETHWORKS GAMING, GREENWOOD GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT and DOWNS RACING
Telesweeps Of Butler Valley, Inc. v. Kelly et al
as 3:2012cv01374
Plaintiff:
Telesweeps Of Butler Valley, Inc.
Defendant:
Linda L. Kelly and Stefanie Salavantis
Intervenor_defendant:
Downs Racing, L.P. , Sands Bethworks Gaming, LLC and Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANDS-REYES v. MENDEZ et al
as 5:2011cv05105
Plaintiff:
ELISAURA SANDS-REYES
Defendant:
RICHARD MENDEZ , BENJAMIN BRADLEY , MATTHEW ODENTHAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ERIE v. SANDS BROTHERS AUTO SALES, INC.
as 5:2011cv03177
Plaintiff:
BONNIE ERIE
Defendant:
SANDS BROTHERS AUTO SALES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Hurst v. Benton Counselman, et al
as 11-1791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY A. HURST
Defendant - Appellee:
BENTON COUNSELMAN, JEFFERY HORVATH, STEVEN GETEK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
