Cases 31 - 40 of 47,172
HARLEY v. MAYOR OF PHILADELPHIA, CHERELLE PARKER et al
as 2:2024cv02729
Plaintiff:
MARY A. HARLEY
Defendant:
MAYOR OF PHILADELPHIA, CHERELLE PARKER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, ALL MEMBERS OF CITY HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flinn v. Lawless et al
as 2:2024cv02706
Plaintiff:
Justin Flinn
Defendant:
Edward Lawless and David Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown et al v. Paris
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Taylor Brown, Shawn Palmer, Max Ness and others
Defendant:
Col. Christopher Paris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams, Jr. v. Pennsylvania State Police
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Heckman et al v. Jumper
as 1:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Heckman and Janet Kemp
Defendant:
Dennis J. Jumper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
LEI et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
VERN LEI and ROSS GILSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
