Cases 31 - 40 of 41
DeJesus v. Loughman et al
as 1:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Carl A. DeJesus
Defendant:
Patrick Loughman, Spinolio and Dowery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv07681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEJESUS v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv05493
Plaintiff:
REINALDO DEJESUS, JR.
Defendant:
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, OFFICE OF THE CLERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKUBU v. WISEBACK et al
as 2:2015cv03399
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN AKUBU
Defendant:
WISEBACK, TRACY GRANT-PRATT, TYREE HOLMES-IRVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv00260
Plaintiff:
YAMIKA SIERRA DEJESUS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and MIKE SZELAGOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrett et al v. McDonald et al
as 1:2014cv00742
Plaintiff:
Theodore Barrett , Ronald Keis , Wilbur Medley and others
Defendant:
Lawrence McDonald , Jill Mosser , Correct Care Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEJESUS v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2014cv03437
Plaintiff:
AIDA DEJESUS
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER , HENRY C. BARRIE , GARY MCCRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv02917
Plaintiff:
REINALDO DEJESUS, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL BONATSOS and THOMAS CARPINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2010cv01563
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA A. GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND , OFFICER MASLANICH , OFFICER SCARPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
