Cases 31 - 40 of 62
DEVINE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv04652
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., NURSE JANE DOE 2, MONTGOMERY COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ELBERT DEVINE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
GASS v. MATTHEWS et al
as 2:2018cv02360
Plaintiff:
JERMAU GASS
Defendant:
ALVIN MATTHEWS, LORENDA HILL, CHERYL HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARDLAW v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01128
Plaintiff:
EXAVIER WARDLAW
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE PHILADELPHIA WATER REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. HARRIDAY et al
as 2:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
TERRY FOSTER
Defendant:
CLIFFORD JEUDY, AL-HAKIM LEWIS, ALISHA LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MICHAUX et al v. TEMAS et al
as 2:2017cv01241
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAUX and JANAYE MICHAUX-ORRIS
Defendant:
JOHN TEMAS , SMITH , SCHULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIALYSIS PATIENT CITIZENS et al v. INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS et al
as 2:2017cv02191
Plaintiff:
DIALYSIS PATIENT CITIZENS , JANE DOE 1 , JANE DOE 2 and others
Defendant:
INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS and QCC INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE 1 et al v. MOUNT LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al
as 2:2016cv00498
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1 , JANE DOE 2 , JANE DOE 3 and others
Defendant:
MOUNT LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT , BRIAN BEGOR and JOHN GROGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIBBONS v. MONTGOMERTY COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv01233
Plaintiff:
JOHN GIBBONS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERTY COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudak v. Clark et al
as 3:2016cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hudak
Defendant:
Benjamin Clark, Kyle Hnat, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
