Civil Rights Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
RETTER v. DOUGLAS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00792
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS E. RETTER
Defendant: GREGORY K. DOUGLAS, TERRY J. MITKO and THE COUNTY OF BEAVER, BEAVER COUNTY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURTS DIVISIONS, BEAVER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00564
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01610
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00971
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
ROMIG v. BEAVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01105
Plaintiff: DALE LAWRENCE ROMIG
Defendant: BEAVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PFEIFFER v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2009cv00968
Plaintiff: ANDREW PFEIFFER
Defendant: COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BEAVER COUNTY and GLENN EATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKEOWN et al v. BRASLAWSCE et al
as 2:2007cv00732
Plaintiff: DENNIS G. MCKEOWN and CANDACE I. MCKEOWN
Defendant: WILLIAM BRASLAWSCE, KRISTINA M. BRASLAWSCE, BEAVER BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00212
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?