Cases 41 - 50 of 186
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mickell v. Geroulo et al
as 3:2020cv00709
Defendant:
Lackawanna County Courthouse Administration, Mauri B. Kelly, Catherine Kacer and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Mickell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01995
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. ACADEMY BUS LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01931
Plaintiff:
RONNIE COLEMAN, JR.
Defendant:
SOUTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT, NJ OFFICE ATTORNEY GENERAL, ACADEMY BUS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00158
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY AT MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY v. TRUSTEES OF MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2020cv00508
Defendant:
PRESIDENT SUSAN A. COLE, THE STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION OF MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY, CHIEF UNIV. POLICE PAUL M CELL and others
Plaintiff:
YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY AT MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY and MENA BOTROS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DALAL v. MOLINELLI et al
as 2:2020cv01434
Plaintiff:
AAKASH DALAL
Defendant:
LILIANA S. DEAVILA-SILEBI, DET. ROBERT ANZILOTTI, L. JUDSON WELLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLEMAN v. CITY HALL OF SOUTH AMBOY
as 3:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
RONNIE COLEMAN, JR.
Defendant:
CITY HALL OF SOUTH AMBOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
