Cases 41 - 50 of 384
HARTIN v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv04204
Plaintiff:
TROY HARTIN
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, CITY OF CHESTER, SHERIFF JERRY L SANDERS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Karns v. Bonawits et al
as 3:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Chirstlynn Karns
Defendant:
Officer Matthew Alan Bonawits, Sgt. Jason Height, Officer John Bevilaqua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kingston Municipal Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv01563
Defendant:
Sgt. Jason Height, Kingston Municipal Police Department, Kingston Borough and others
Plaintiff:
Musa Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITNEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04006
Plaintiff:
FEIL WHITNEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE 1-10 and JOHN DOE PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bartol et al v. Arbogast et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Katherine Bartol
Defendant:
Dauphin County, John/Jane Does 1 - 10 and Pamela Arbogast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WANG v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2020cv01952
Defendant:
WILEY PERIODICALS, INC., UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS, MARK GLADWIN and others
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
KABAKA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv06174
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN/JANE DOE #1-10
Plaintiff:
KWABENA KABAKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02239
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Osagie v. Borough of State College et al
as 4:2020cv02024
Defendant:
John Does #1-10 and Borough of State College
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Osagie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
