Cases 41 - 50 of 242
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania v. Gibson
as 1:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Bernard Eugene Gibson, III
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEKRILOV et al v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY
as 2:2019cv22182
Plaintiff:
JAYU JEN, KWAN HO TANG, ALAN SUEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SMART v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2019cv21622
Defendant:
REX UTUK, MICHAEL MCLAUGHLIN, TIM GASKILL and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK SMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv05470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SNYDER v. BOROUGH OF FRANKLIN et al
as 2:2019cv18339
Defendant:
GREG CULGIARI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE CHIEF OF THE BOROUGH OF FRANKLIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAYOR AND COUNCIL FOR BOROUGH OF FRANKLIN, EUGENE MCINERNEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS FORMER CHIEF OF THE BOROUGH OF FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SMITH v. BOROUGH OF FRANKLIN et al
as 2:2019cv17949
Defendant:
COUNCIL FOR BOROUGH OF FRANKLIN, NEVIN MATTESSICH, EUGENE MCINERNEY and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
MCCLERKLIN v. DESALES UNIVERSITY et al
as 5:2019cv01558
Defendant:
DESALES UNIVERSITY, DR. EUGENE DECKER and BARBARA MORICI
Plaintiff:
ALAINA MCCLERKLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WOODEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01054
Defendant:
BARRY CHARLES, EUGENE KITTLES, DONALD CAIN and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CENAKA WOODEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAMBRELL et al v. SOUTH BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 3:2018cv16359
Plaintiff:
DORIS M. GAMBRELL and EUGENE C. GAMBRELL
Defendant:
SOUTH BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
