Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 211
Susquehanna Realty Group, LLC et al v. Borough of Wyoming et al
as 3:2019cv00373
Defendant: Borough of Wyoming, Stephen Nalewajko and Francis Yurek
Plaintiff: Susquehanna Realty Group, LLC and Patrick Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Taurasi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00001
Defendant: Bryan Kauffman, RisMiller Law Group, LLC, Judge Richard Lewis and others
Plaintiff: Cornelius E. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv04653
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00116
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00115
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilkins v. Chardo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00727
Plaintiff: Glue Wilkins
Defendant: Francis T. Chardo, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Petrus et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00697
Plaintiff: Edward Thomas Kennedy
Defendant: Philip Carl Petrus, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04832
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Muhammad v. Chardo et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff: Aiyda Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant: Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and Bradley A. Winnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THORNTON v. FRANCIS et al
as 2:2018cv00829
Plaintiff: FELICIA THORNTON
Defendant: FRANKIE E. FRANCIS and FRANCIS FUNERAL HOME, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?