Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Rankin v. Majikes et al
as 3:2014cv00699
Plaintiff:
James Rankin
Defendant:
John Majikes , Scott Hine , Joseph Zigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD et al v. PHILADELPHIA HIGHWAY POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 2:2014cv02034
Plaintiff:
LAMAR CRAWFORD and AARON JOHNSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HIGHWAY POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, PHILADELPHIA HIGHWAY POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #2, CAPTAIN JOHN DOE OF THE 39TH CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
REYES v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2013cv06916
Plaintiff:
RAUL REYES
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY, KEVIN BETHEL, WILLIAM V. FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE et al v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2013cv06606
Plaintiff:
NOEL AUGUSTINE , MICHAEL BARANKOVICH , MOSHE BITTERMAN and others
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY, KEVIN BETHEL, WILLIAM V. FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. GIFFORD et al
as 2:2013cv01252
Plaintiff:
RAMAR MORGAN
Defendant:
GIFFORD , WOOD, STEBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSER v. CARBON COUNTY et al
as 5:2013cv01066
Plaintiff:
LARRY JAN MOSER, JR.
Defendant:
CARBON COUNTY, LEHIGH COUNTY, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gibson v. Steelton Police Dept. et al
as 1:2012cv01328
Plaintiff:
Daryl T'wain Gibson, Sr.
Defendant:
Steelton Police Dept., David Crawford and Arthur G. Etnoyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
