Cases 51 - 60 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAMACHO v. TOWNSHIP OF UNION BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2014cv02711
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRE CAMACHO
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UNION BOARD OF EDUCATION , PATRICK MARTIN , EDWARD GIBBONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRIPPETT v. ROSE et al
as 2:2014cv01564
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TRIPPETT
Defendant:
DANIEL ROSE and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPEGGIO v. UPPER POTTSGROVE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2014cv01286
Plaintiff:
MELINDA CAMPEGGIO
Defendant:
UPPER POTTSGROVE TOWNSHIP, WILLIAM MOFFETT, SEAN FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYTAS et al v. BAYOBBE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2013cv07676
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HAYTAS , DEBRA HAYTAS and JOHN DOES 1-3
Defendant:
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION, CITY OF BAYONNE and JOHN DOES 1-5, Individually
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIGANGI v. MEDIA BOROUGH et al
as 2:2013cv06258
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DIGANGI
Defendant:
MEDIA BOROUGH , ERIC GAVIN , MCCORMICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SISCO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05143
Plaintiff:
JEROME SISCO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MATTHEW BLASZCZYUK, WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BAILEY v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BLAIRSTOWN et al
as 3:2013cv01061
Plaintiff:
THERESA BAILEY
Defendant:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BLAIRSTOWN , BLAIRSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT , DETECTIVE JONATHAN BEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BULLOCK v. PROJECT H.O.M.E. et al
as 2:2012cv05625
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE BULLOCK
Defendant:
PROJECT H.O.M.E. , JOHN DOE #1-3, DANIELLE ALBA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
