Cases 61 - 70 of 87
GRANGE v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2010cv03349
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MAE GRANGE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY , JULIO M. ALGARIN , NIKKI HOLLER, R.N. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROE v. SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT, DONALD J. TYLINSKI, MARK KORCINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
RODGERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv00954
Plaintiff:
THEODORE RODGERS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JANE DOE, POLICE OFFICER, JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv04652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MAUDE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv01767
Plaintiff:
JAMES MAUDE and JAMES MAUDE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., JANE DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRENSHAW et al v. MCALOCUM et al
as 2:2009cv00685
Plaintiff:
BRANDI LLOYD CRENSHAW, OLIVER CRENSHAW, REIAYANAMI CRENSHAW and others
Defendant:
MCALOCUM, JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MARTINEZ et al v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
JUAN MARTINEZ and ELIZABETH MARTINEZ
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, VINCENT GUARINI, STEVEN NAPOLITAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
