Cases 71 - 78 of 78
BRETT v. FUMO et al
as 2:2008cv05080
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
VINCENT FUMO, RUTH ARMAO, CAROLYN ZIMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Toy-Ling Washington v. Brenda Brunishuiz
as 08-3410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOY-LING WASHINGTON, agent for principle Beverly Knight and NICHOLAS TART, son of plaintiff and Minor as applies
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDA BRUNISHUIZ, DEVEUREX FNDTN, HEATHER HANDLON and others
Defendant:
ANN RUBIN, KATHARINE STALKER, OWEN THOMPSON and others
ESTATE OF JOHN EDWARD KNIGHT, SR, DECEASED, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE CLASS DEFINED HERIN, HEIR(S) et al v. SOVEREIGN BANK, INC
as 2:2008cv03722
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOHN EDWARD KNIGHT, SR, DECEASED, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE CLASS DEFINED HERIN, HEIR(S) and YAHYA ABDULMALIK
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN BANK, INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PATTERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv02140
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. PATTERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LYNN ABRAHAM, ERIC GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Samuel Ruiz, et al v. County of Lebanon, et al
as 08-1672
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARMEN L. FRET APONTE and SAMUEL RUIZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEBANON, A county organized and existing within the state of Pennsylvania, CITY OF LEBANON, LEBANON CTY POL DEPT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD A. RADWANSKI
Neuberger v. Baker et al
as 1:2007cv00723
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Neuberger
Defendant:
James M. Baker, Leo Lynch, Ellis Blomquist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
