Cases 81 - 90 of 100
CENTRALIZED INFRACTIONS BUREAU et al v. ABDULMALIK
as 2:2011cv07051
Plaintiff:
CENTRALIZED INFRACTIONS BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Defendant:
YAHYA: ABDULMALIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASON v. "DHS" et al
as 2:2011cv04614
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE-ELIZABETH MASON
Defendant:
"DHS, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSH-MATHIS v. ERIE COUNTY COLLECTIONS - COURT BUREAU et al
as 1:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
MARY A. MARSH-MATHIS
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY COLLECTIONS - COURT BUREAU, UNITED STATES GOVT. and STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRODZKI v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. BRODZKI
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEISURE v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD YOUTH SERVICES et al
as 5:2010cv07565
Plaintiff:
JUNIUS LEISURE
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD YOUTH SERVICES, WILNIA GONZALEZ, SHEA KINSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANGO v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA MEGAN LAW
as 2:2010cv07398
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA MEGAN LAW
Plaintiff:
NOEL K. BANGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2010cv01272
Plaintiff:
SHELLY L. BRYANT
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OBIANYO v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA UC. SERVICE
as 2:2010cv04521
Plaintiff:
UCHENNA OBIANYO
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA UC. SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JACKSON v. EASTON et al
as 2:2010cv00518
Plaintiff:
GREGORY B. JACKSON
Defendant:
KIMBERLEY EASTON, CITY OF PITTSBURGH EMPLOYEES, ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMPLOYEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culver v. State Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2010cv00382
Plaintiff:
James L. Culver
Defendant:
State Of Pennsylvania and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
