Cases 81 - 90 of 1,584
Edward Williams v. Attorney General United States of America, et al
as 24-1091
Plaintiff:
EDWARD A. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DIRECTOR BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ECHO LAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
ECHO LAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC and SYED NURUZZAMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JACQUELINE C. ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Anthony Custer v. Jason Green, et al
as 24-1013
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH CUSTER
Defendant:
JASON GREEN, CO-TRUSTEE OR CURRENT OCCUPANT, TIM REARDON, CO-TRUSTEE OR CURRENT OCCUPANT, GEORGE SOLIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Patelunas v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. Patelunas
Defendant:
United States, Clerk's Office Scranton, PA, Commonwealth of PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
