Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Elad v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Elad
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Joshua Collins, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant:
KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALLARD v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BALLARD
Defendant:
MURRAY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
MEYER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv15273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHN MEYER
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, J. SALANITRO, S. YATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JAYE v. GREWAL et al
as 2:2021cv01566
Defendant:
ROBERT KUGLER, Guillermo Argote, WILLIAM WALSH and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballard v. City of Scranton et al
as 3:2020cv01623
Defendant:
Scranton Police, City of Scranton and Gallagher
Plaintiff:
Tawanda Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv00139
Defendant:
YAHEEDAH HILLIARD, LOUIS MOORE, JULLIAN and others
Plaintiff:
THERMUTHIS BALLARD LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
