Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BRILL v. EINFALT #477 et al
as 5:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRILL
Defendant:
OFC. MADISYN EINFALT #477, OFC. JEREMY BANKS #472, OFC. ROBERT CONSTABLE #442 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holly English, et al v. City of Wilkes Barre, et al
as 22-2477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOLLY ENGLISH, COURTNEY DAVIS, HOLLY ANN BRILL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
D. DOE and R. T. DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WILKES BARRE and ROBERT COLLINS
Brill v. Commonwealth Clinical Group et al
as 1:2021cv01331
Plaintiff:
Janet Brill
Defendant:
Commonwealth Clinical Group, Christina Ludwig, Jonathan M. Gransee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brill v. Livaditis
as 1:2021cv00596
Defendant:
Dorothy Livaditis
Plaintiff:
Janet G. Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KARKALAS v. MARKS et al
as 2:2019cv00948
Defendant:
LINDA MARKS and KIMBERLY BRILL
Plaintiff:
ELIAS KARKALAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MCKENNA v. MIGNELLA et al
as 5:2016cv01017
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW D. MCKENNA
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. MIGNELLA, MICHAEL SHALE, TIMOTHY VANHISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin Credico v. David Sprague, et al
as 15-2434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID SPRAGUE, JOE MILLIGAN, JIM FITZGERALD and others
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. HSFLB Condominium Owners Assoc, et al
as 13-3141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
Defendant - Appellee:
HSFLB CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
