Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Vonville et al v. Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv01603
Plaintiff:
Philip J Vonville and Joseph J. Vonville
Defendant:
Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department, Tobyhanna Township, Tunkhannock Township and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEMINGWAY v. UNITED STATES FBI et al
as 2:2020cv00638
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY PAROLE OFFICE, PECO ELECTRIC, LOWER MAKEFIELD POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JAMES HEMINGWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. HOUTON et al
as 2:2020cv01102
Defendant:
JONATHAN HOUTON, IMANI OLIVER, MICHAEL PRATT and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERON REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. EINSTEIN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2020cv01101
Defendant:
IMANI OLIVER, CHANNEL JONES.W, JONATHAN HOUTON and others
Plaintiff:
WINCHELLA HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
EVANS v. ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND OFFICERS INVOLVED et al
as 1:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. EVANS
Defendant:
ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND OFFICERS INVOLVED, DELUCA, PILARSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLAZE v. CHANNEL 6 NEWS et al
as 2:2014cv02316
Plaintiff:
SONDA R. GLAZE
Defendant:
CHANNEL 6 NEWS and WALMART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
