Cases 1 - 10 of 26
COY v. GUY et al
as 3:2020cv15947
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 7, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS STRIKE TASK FORCE, DANIEL MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LOVE v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2012cv01455
Plaintiff:
JASON A. LOVE
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN PARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAHAM v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2012cv01183
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , ARTURO VENEGAS , EDWARD HARGIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUIZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00971
Plaintiff:
OSCAR RUIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARMICHAEL v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
OBIE CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVEZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00513
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHAVEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00495
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00496
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
