Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
WESTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02432
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WESTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, DIDONATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAND v. PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LAND
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP , SHAUN KOZAK , DAVID ZINNI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ et al v. DIDONATO et al
as 3:2016cv02939
Plaintiff:
EDWIN LOPEZ and MERCEDES LOPEZ
Defendant:
ROSE DIDONATO , PAUL DIDONATO , VICTORIA DIDONATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIORENTINO v. TOWN OF HAMMONTON et al
as 1:2016cv02019
Plaintiff:
MARK FIORENTINO
Defendant:
TOWN OF HAMMONTON , POLICE DEPARTMENT OF HAMMONTON , DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELVILA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02521
Plaintiff:
JUAN DELVILA , JUAN SOLER , TONY MASON and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CRUZ et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
JOEL CRUZ , ADALERTO MORALES RODRIGUEZ and JOSHUA MORALES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
