Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
OTERO v. Kane et al
as 2:2022cv04141
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA OTERO
Cross Claimant:
Police Officer Christian Kane, Police Officer Alexander Hernandez and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cross Defendant:
Tahir Ellison
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
ELLISON v. GOGA et al
as 2:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELLISON
Defendant:
JACOB GOGA, STEPHEN PAPUGA and JOHN STEFANIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant:
MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MCCUTCHEON et al
as 2:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
EDNA MCCUTCHEON, ALISSA WILLIAMS, LEAH MANRUSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
ELLISON v. CRUMP et al
as 2:2013cv03378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLISON
Defendant:
M. CRUMP , JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL SUPERVISOR, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS (NOS. 1 -2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
