Cases 1 - 10 of 354
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
POLICZ v. RUSSO et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Defendant:
DAVID RUSSO, GREENE COUNTY REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF GREENE, PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Paul Policz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00901
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. FEDERAL POLICES et al
as 2:2024cv02322
Plaintiff:
LOUSEVEJO JONES
Defendant:
FEDERAL POLICES, D.O.C. GREEN COUNTY and PHILADELPHIA POLICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
HARDAWAY v. GREEN EGGS CAFE
as 2:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
GREEN EGGS CAFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. City of Hazleton et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Neal Forte
Defendant:
City of Hazleton and Brett Green Naprava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEATHERS et al v. RUSSO et al
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Gregory Clay Leathers and Robert Jeffrey Rhodes
Defendant:
DAVID RUSSO, ZACHARY SAMS, Greene County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Munley et al
as 3:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Lance Green
Defendant:
Aloyisus Munley, Ryan Griffiths, Jordan Mazzoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. FEDERAL POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
LOUSEVEJO JONES
Defendant:
FEDERAL POLICE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE and D.O.C. GREEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
