Cases 1 - 10 of 58
SHENK v. GRIFFITHS et al
as 2:2024cv02458
Defendant:
AMY L. GRIFFITHS, AMY L. SHENK, JANE & JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHENK v. SHENK
as 2:2024cv02334
Defendant:
AMY L. SHENK and AMY L. GRIFFITHS
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A. SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Munley et al
as 3:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Lance Green
Defendant:
Aloyisus Munley, Ryan Griffiths, Jordan Mazzoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SHENK v. AMY L. GRIFFITHS
as 2:2024cv00957
Defendant:
AMY L. GRIFFITHS and AMY L. SHENK
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A. SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv20513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
LASTELLA v. GRIFFITH-ALLIED TRUCKING LLC et al
as 3:2022cv05108
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LASTELLA
Defendant:
GRIFFITH-ALLIED TRUCKING LLC, GRIFFITH ENERGY SERVICES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
GOMEZ v. MATOS TOWING et al
as 5:2022cv04371
Plaintiff:
LAWANDA GOMEZ
Defendant:
MATOS TOWING, MATTHEW GRIFFITH and WILLIAM FURSIN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
