Cases 1 - 10 of 15
TURNER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2020cv00533
Defendant:
MELANIE ARMSTRONG, ELIZABETH MUOIO, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT K. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BHATT v. CARTMELL et al
as 2:2017cv06183
Plaintiff:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant:
EMILY CARTMELL, CHRISTOPHER GRAMICCIONI, JOHN JAY HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BHATT v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2016cv03715
Plaintiff:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant:
AT&T INC., COLLABERA INC., MICHAEL CHIRICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02081
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LEJON-TWIN EL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY-JOHN JAY HOFFMAN et al
as 2:2015cv08136
Plaintiff:
ERWIN LEJON-TWIN EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY-JOHN JAY HOFFMAN, JOANNE RAJOPPI , ROBERT E. BARRY, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALBERT v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 3:2015cv07266
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE-HUDSON ALBERT
Defendant:
CATHERINE FITZPATRICK, MARY C. JACOBSON, SUE REGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NANTICOKE LENNI-LENAPE TRIBAL NATION v. HOFFMAN
as 1:2015cv05645
Plaintiff:
NANTICOKE LENNI-LENAPE TRIBAL NATION
Defendant:
JOHN JAY HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARISTEO v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, JODY RAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BHATT v. HOFFMAN et al
as 3:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant:
JOHN JAY HOFFMAN, MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER, NJ, WILLIAM MOSCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Rawley et al
as 2:2014cv06743
Plaintiff:
Jessica C. Graham
Defendant:
Charles T. Rawley, Nancy Herrera, ERIC PETERSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
