Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROJAS VILLAPLANA v. RANDAZZO et al
as 2:2016cv08767
Plaintiff:
ALLAN N ROJAS VILLAPLANA
Defendant:
GIUSEPPE C RANDAZZO, GARFIELD CITY MUNICIPAL COURT and NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELEUTERI v. ROJAS et al
as 3:2013cv04326
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE A. ELEUTERI
Defendant:
NEIL ROJAS, GARY GORE and UNNAMED DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AP AUTO PARTS AND SERVICE CENTER, INC. et al v. JOHN DOES 1-10 et al
as 2:2012cv06217
Plaintiff:
AP AUTO PARTS AND SERVICE CENTER, INC. , ERENILDA MERCEDES ROJAS-PEREZ , LUGI LUNA and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv07182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ATKINSON v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY et al
as 3:2009cv04863
Plaintiff:
JORDAN ATKINSON
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
