Cases 1 - 10 of 180
MITCHELL v. FRANKFORD AVENUE RITE AID et al
as 2:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
FRANKFORD AVENUE RITE AID, DUNKIN DONUTS, WAWA FRANKFORD AVENUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEARD v. HCF OF FAIRVIEW, INC.
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
ROSE L. BEARD
Defendant:
HCF OF FAIRVIEW, INC. doing business as FAIRVIEW MANOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
GOOLD et al v. OPERA et al
as 2:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ANN GOOLD and BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
DANIEL OPERA, MARY ROSE OPERA, UPPER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kuntz v. McPherson
as 4:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Lance Christian Kuntz
Defendant:
Tom Rose McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ROSE-THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
AMBER ROSE-THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ROSE-THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYVLANIA
as 2:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
AMBER ROSE-THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Allen et al v. Salem Township
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen, Troy Campbell, Rose Campbell and others
Defendant:
Salem Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSE v. TYNDALE
as 5:2022cv04573
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Defendant:
SHANNON TYNDALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
