Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Propst v. Williamsport, PA et al
as 4:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Stacey Propst, Sr., Erika Propst, Jah'sin Propst and others
Defendant:
Williamsport, Pa, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PROPST v. WILLIAMSPORT, PA et al
as 2:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
STACEY, ERIKA, JAH'SIN & 7EVEN, STACEY PROPST, JR
Defendant:
WILLIAMSPORT, PA, (POLICE OFFICER) JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA et al
as 2:2017cv01641
Plaintiff:
YONG CHUL SON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA, SEPTA TRANSPORTATION, JACK M BERNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DAVENPORT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA et al
as 2:2016cv06397
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL DAVENPORT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA , VARELA LUZ and ELIEZER A. MORALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BULLOCK et al v. LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR AND SAMPSON, LLP et al
as 2:2013cv02411
Plaintiff:
JANICE A. BULLOCK
Defendant:
LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR AND SAMPSON, LLP , GEORGE V. BAKER, JR., MICHAEL A. COHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CREAMER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA. et al
as 2:2011cv07308
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BROOKE CREAMER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA., COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
THE POOR PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA. et al v. S.E.P.T.A., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03114
Plaintiff:
THE POOR PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA. and AMIR V. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
S.E.P.T.A., INC., SEPTA'S MANAGEMENT and BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
