Cases 101 - 110 of 85,189
Edward Sartoris v. Haidle, et al
as 24-1871
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SARTORIS
Defendant:
WARDEN HAIDLE, SGT. ZITO, Correctional Officer and DEPUTY WARDEN MCCOY
Pearson, Jr. v. Danfelt et al
as 3:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly K. Danfelt, Dave Ernest, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jack Morgan v. Warden Allenwood USP
as 24-1508
Plaintiff:
JACK WILLIAM MORGAN
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD USP
FELICIANO v. BALATGEK et al
as 5:2024cv02010
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE S. FELICIANO
Defendant:
OFFICER KAILA BALATGEK and THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH et al
as 5:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
EDWIN GEORGE PFURSICH, IV and CODY PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township et al
as 2:2024cv01885
Petitioner:
Keith D. Morrison II
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Coal Township, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STOKES v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv06037
Petitioner:
BRAD STOKES
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kathleen Dorsett v. Warden New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1881
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. DORSETT
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
REESE v. BOOHER et al
as 2:2024cv01192
Petitioner:
DONTA REESE
Respondent:
BRADLEY BOOHER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. BARRAZA et al
as 2:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM LATEEF RAKIM SMITH
Defendant:
CARLOS BARRAZA, BRIAN MCCARTHY, PATRICK CARMODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
