Cases 111 - 120 of 420
GIBSON v. CONINA et al
as 2:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
KELLY GIBSON
Defendant:
MARRY CONINA, JOHN WEZTLE and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BD et al
as 2:2015cv01683
Petitioner:
TERRY ALLAN HAYES
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BD , LABENNY , HERBERSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. MOORE et al
as 2:2015cv01622
Petitioner:
NEIL D. JACKSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND MOORE and TOM CORBET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HERNANDEZ v. MALAY et al
as 3:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
IVAN HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
TOM MALAY, PRIME CARE and DEPUTY PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRIGHTWELL v COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (ET.AL.)
as 1:2015cv00263
Petitioner:
BOBBY BRIGHTWELL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLANIA, (ET.AL.), PENNSYLVANIA PROBATION AND PAROLE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT et al
as 2:2015cv05681
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORE v. VUKSTA et al
as 2:2015cv05608
Petitioner:
ALLEN TREMAYNE GORE
Respondent:
VUKSTA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ADA-HUGH T. BURNS, ESQ. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JEROME v. DELAWARE COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2015cv05449
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EDDY JEROME
Respondent:
DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, MICHAEL DUGAN, CHRISTINA STAUNTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Percy Pew v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv01611
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
E.A. Jones, Youch, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
