Cases 131 - 140 of 382
SHEPPARD v. CONWAY et al
as 2:2015cv01589
Plaintiff:
JASON C. SHEPPARD
Defendant:
BRENDAN T. CONWAY and GARY EVAN GERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartone v. Overmyer et al
as 1:2015cv02142
Petitioner:
Gary Bartone
Respondent:
Michael D. Overmyer, Stefanie J. Salavantis and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GERLACH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2015cv06015
Petitioner:
GARY CHARLES GERLACH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gerlach v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2015cv02097
Petitioner:
Gary Charles Gerlach
Respondent:
Commonwealth of PA and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2015cv01959
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Robert Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CODNER v. WARDEN-PIKE COUNTY et al
as 5:2015cv05176
Petitioner:
GARY LEAFORD CODNER
Respondent:
WARDEN-PIKE COUNTY, PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILDER v. USA
as 2:2015cv01095
Petitioner:
GARY KENNETH WILDER, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROBINSON v. S.C.I. CAMPHILL'S MEDICAL DEPT. et al
as 1:2015cv01610
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Sr.
Defendant:
S.C.I. Camphill's Medical Dept. and Shoop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UPSHUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv04688
Plaintiff:
ALBERT UPSHUR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv04591
Petitioner:
GARY MANN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
