Cases 151 - 160 of 989
KINNARD v. WETZEL
as 2:2021cv00933
Petitioner:
GREGORY KINNARD
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
DONALD BANKS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, E. Tice, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEUTSCH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00915
Petitioner:
JAMES DEUTSCH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MORRIS HOUSER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv03375
Petitioner:
KEENAN MCINTOSH
Respondent:
JOHN E WETZEL, ERIC TICE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00110
Respondent:
LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, JOHN E. WETZEL, ERIC TICE and others
Petitioner:
KENNAN MCINTOSH and KEENAN MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Benton v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
James Benton
Defendant:
K. Laird, T. Walker, D. Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VEGA v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv01193
Petitioner:
John Anthony Vega
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, The District Attorney of the County of Carbon and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GAMBREL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00888
Petitioner:
WILEY ESTILL GAMBREL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VEGA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv02899
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CARBON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JOHN ANTHONY VEGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
